The world’s premier network for those seeking to share and discuss high-impact,high results, super practical information for the developmentof superiorphysical performance.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
Like Tree5Likes

Thread: Do you know The natural frequency and range of motion for the kettlebell swing?

  1. #1
    ashatage is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    5

    Default Do you know The natural frequency and range of motion for the kettlebell swing?

    As per Research done on the American kettlebell swing concluded that it is 85 %more effective than the Russian swing. The Russian swing has a natural frequency of 47 strokes/ minute while the American swing is forty. The range of motion of the Russian swing is approximately 3.75 feet while that of the American swing is 6.5 feet.

    So think Which one is good?

  2. #2
    velocity is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Santa Fe, NM
    Posts
    38

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ashatage View Post
    As per Research done on the American kettlebell swing concluded that it is 85 %more effective than the Russian swing. The Russian swing has a natural frequency of 47 strokes/ minute while the American swing is forty. The range of motion of the Russian swing is approximately 3.75 feet while that of the American swing is 6.5 feet.

    So think Which one is good?
    I don't think the ROM of the bell matters when the purpose of the swing is hip extension.

    We like our clients shoulders to stay intact, so when going overhead, we snatch.

    cheers
    MilkManX likes this.

  3. #3
    Johnny SWAT is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    23

    Default

    I have to agree with Velocity. If you're going high, then snatch. I see the 'American' swing as crossfit's way of putting their own 'our way is better' stamp on things.

  4. #4
    AndrewR is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    1,328

    Default

    Moses Correa and MilkManX like this.

  5. #5
    Paul Britt, RKC is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Rockwall Texas
    Posts
    368
    Blog Entries
    197

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ashatage View Post
    As per Research done on the American kettlebell swing concluded that it is 85 %more effective than the Russian swing. The Russian swing has a natural frequency of 47 strokes/ minute while the American swing is forty. The range of motion of the Russian swing is approximately 3.75 feet while that of the American swing is 6.5 feet.

    So think Which one is good?

    Andrew has a great article on the whys and wherefores.

    When looking at research. What are criteria are you using to you judging it being more effective?

    It is one thing to make a statement, but the studies have to have valid point that we look at.

  6. #6
    ComradeCat is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    289

    Default

    This decision to go with the eye-level or overhead swing appears to be very academic and cerebral in nature.

    Sure we can debate all we want about the swing styles - American vs Russian, hard style vs fluid. However, in practice, would the American swing have that much more impact and ROI as compared to the Russian swing, given the increased risks of the overhead position?

    Unless you are maxing out 64kg overhead snatches, why can't you use the Russian swing with a heavier bell? More reps in each set? Or more sets with the same reps? Faster sets?

    It seems to me that you're trying to squeeze every minute for its worth. Sure I understand the need to maximize the impact of every hour spent on the workout, however; it appears that you're going into the bodybuilder's mentality of comparing whether you'll get more protein from a free-range egg, or a regular egg or an Omega-3 enhanced egg.

    Swing heavier, swing more, swing faster, and enjoy your workout. You'll see an impact to your workout efforts. The marginal cost of the American swing (the bell smashing down on your head) seems higher than its marginal benefits (that much little bit more more micro-trauma on your muscles)
    Moses Correa likes this.

  7. #7
    Chris Hansen is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    2,158

    Default

    The swing is a hip extension exerise. Raising the arms more doesn't increase the range-of-motion of your hip extension.

    Is there a link to this research? I get the impression they're defining "effectiveness" as how far the weight moves but I don't think that's a valid indicator.
    Last edited by Chris Hansen; 06-10-2014 at 04:01 AM.
    Paul Britt, RKC likes this.

  8. #8
    ComradeCat is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    289

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chris Hansen View Post
    I get the impression they're defining "effectiveness" as how far the weight moves but I don't think that's a valid indicator.
    Now this puzzles me, why would we wanna add an risk of head trauma from having the bell turn over and smashing down to increase the ROM? If the intent is to lift the bell higher without a technical move like the snatch... shouldn't the person be doing a clean and press?
    Last edited by ComradeCat; 06-11-2014 at 07:29 PM.

  9. #9
    donaldroche847 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Tampa, FL, USA
    Posts
    1

    Default

    I think the American swing is good than Russian swing.
    [url=http://www.kettlebellsaustralia.com.au]4 kg to 40 kg kettlebells[/url]

  10. #10
    ashatage is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    5

    Default

    The American swing generated 25% beats per minute more on average than the Russian swing kettlebell exercises. This analysis is based on the displacement of the load vertically, rate of repetition of the motion and perceived effort as the main influences of the heart rate and the intensity of the workout.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Free Course
Close